Legal Opinion
MACKLANBURG-DUNCAN COMPANY v. Wimmer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1955No. 36509PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
On September 22, 1953, Virginia Wim-mer, respondent herein, filed her claim for compensation against Macklanburg-Duncan Company and its insurance carrier, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, referred to as petitioners herein, in which she stated that on July 20, 1953, while in the employ ■of petitioner, Macklanburg-Duncan Company, she sustained an accidental injury consisting of an injured disc. The injury was caused by a strain while engaged in lifting a keg of iron hinges.
The trial commissioner, at the close of the evidence, found: On the 20th day of July, 1953, respondent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Works v. SabinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pioneer Mills Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Williams Bros. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- EL Mendenhall Company v. KellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. HellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Kelley v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Thomas v. Burggraf RestorationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.