Legal Opinion

Carr v. Austin Forty

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1987No. 3-86-129-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

Kenneth D. Carr, appellant, sued Austin Forty, a California limited partnership, and Anthony J. Ujdur, trustee, for return of an earnest-money letter of credit and recovery on a quantum meruit claim for labor and services. Appellees counter-claimed alleging breach of contract, violation of fiduciary duty, and violation of § 17.46(b)(2), (3), (5) and (23) of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.46(b) (Vernon 1987). The trial court rendered a Nunc Pro Tunc judgment ordering that the parties take nothing. Carr appeals from the take-nothing judgment. We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Schaefer v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McKinley v. DrozdTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. GuexTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jim Howe Homes, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Helping Hands Home Care, Inc. D/B/A at Home Healthcare, Johnny James Grice v. Home Health of Tarrant County, Inc. D/B/A Home Health Specialties, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. Texas American Corp. v. Woodbridge Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Llanes v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API