Chenoweth v. Earhart
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from -a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Santa Cruz. Prank Baxter, Judge. Tho facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is a contested election ease. Prom a judgment in favor of the appellee, who was contestee in the lower court, the contestant and appellant appeals. The office involved is that of treasurer of Santa Cruz county. The canvassing board issued its certificate of election to the contestee, and declared and certified therein that the contestee had received 283 votes and the contestant 277 votes for such office. The case turns upon the vote of Mowry precinct. In this precinct 14 votes were cast—12 for contestee and 2 for contestant. If the vote of this precinct be rejected, the contestant would…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Dale v. IrwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Russell v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Preston v. CulbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Kenworthy v. MastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. City of PageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Williams v. SherwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Citizens for a Referendum Vote v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Semke v. WilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.