Legal Opinion

Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 21, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 92-0097PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Presiding Judge.

Appellants appeal from the order of the trial court setting aside the result of a budget override election after that result was contested by appellees. Because this appeal from an election contest presents mixed questions of fact and law, our review is de novo. Tovrea Land & Cattle Co. v. Linsenmeyer, 100 Ariz. 107, 412 P.2d 47 (1966). We reverse based upon the following facts and the law in this jurisdiction for determining election contests.

In November 1991, Picacho Elementary School District # 33 voted to hold a budget override election pursuant to A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clark v. QuickIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Larson v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Morgan v. Board of Sup'rsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District No. 33Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API