Telcordia Tech Inc, in the Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Controversies Between v. Telkom Sa Ltd
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
We review here two orders by the District Court of New Jersey. In the first, the District Court granted Telkom SA Ltd.’s motion to dismiss Telcordia Technologies Inc.’s petition to confirm a partial arbitral award. Specifically, the District Court dismissed Telcordia’s petition with prejudice because of issue preclusion or estoppel resulting from a previous decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissing a similar petition by Telcordia without prejudice. In the alternative, but still in the first order, the District Court dismissed the petition…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Eurofins Pharma US Holdings v. BioAlliance Pharma SACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corp. v. State Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Milad Allaham v. Fadi NaddafCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Belt v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.