Legal Opinion

Chenault v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 2011No. 10AP-1113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryant, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Danny Chenault, appeals from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims that both granted the Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings of defendants-appellees, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (“ODJFS”) and Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission (“the commission”), and dismissed plaintiffs complaint. Because the Court of Claims *734did not err in determining that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim, we affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} The factual allegations of plaintiffs amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cogley v. Ohio Unemp. Rev. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Jabr v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API