Chenault v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Bryant, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Danny Chenault, appeals from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims that both granted the Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings of defendants-appellees, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (“ODJFS”) and Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission (“the commission”), and dismissed plaintiffs complaint. Because the Court of Claims *734did not err in determining that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim, we affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The factual allegations of plaintiffs amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cogley v. Ohio Unemp. Rev. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Jabr v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020