Legal Opinion

Johnson v. International Agricultural Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 29, 1930No. 20260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In order to render a promissory note a sealed instrument, tlie intention to execute it as sueli must appear both in the body of the instrument and after the signature. Jackson v. Augusta Southern Ry. Co., 125 Ga. 801 (54 S. E. 697); Brooks v. Kiser, 69 Ga. 762. It has also been held that the phrase, “Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of,” or the like, above the space for witnessing, does not indicate any intention of the parties to execute a sealed instrument, but is merely a statement to be signed by a witness or witnesses. Echols v. Phillips, 112 Ga. 700 (37 S. E. 977);…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxley Hardware Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Echols v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Jackson v. Augusta Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Barnes v. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. TELFAIR FINANCE COMPANY v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Dundon v. ForehandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pattillo Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Woodall v. HixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API