Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Henriksen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 8, 1955No. Gen. 46,484PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewe

The defendants, who are the insured and named beneficiary in a life insurance policy issued by plaintiff, appeal from a decree reforming the policy and perpetually enjoining them or anyone claiming through them from maintaining any action on the policy except for the amount of it as reformed.

There was evidence that: On February 29, 1932, the defendant Everett N. Henriksen, aged 12, applied to plaintiff by written application for an ordinary life insurance policy under a plan of insurance known as “Life with Premium Reduced” L. P. R. The pertinent provisions of the signed application read:

“No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  2. Buck v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stoltz v. National Indemnity Co. of OmahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Mates v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Richardson v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. LE Myers Co. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Baldwin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Roherty v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Estate of Blakely v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Friedman v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API