Legal Opinion

Monte Mills v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided August 17, 2026No. 1:22-cv-00143Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO MONTE MILLS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00143-DCN Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION v. AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Dkt. 142. Union Pacific asks the Court to enter judgment as a matter of law in its favor after a jury determined it was liable for terminating Plaintiff Monte Mills in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Because the Court disagrees with Union Pacific’s legal arguments, because…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Surrell v. California Water Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API