Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Guldi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 1999No. 98-278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, P., Associate Judge.

The appellants, Joseph and Mary Gardner, are judgment creditors in a mortgage foreclosure action against Max and Mary Mustard. The Gardners challenge the trial court’s determination of the priority of their judgment lien in the foreclosure action. We reverse.

In November of 1990, the Mustards executed a mortgage on their property in Putnam County to Barnett Bank (not a party to this action) to secure payment of a $50,050 note. This mortgage is an open-ended mortgage authorized by section 697.04, Florida Statutes, and contains a future advance clause which states as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sonia Uransky, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Dean Barnard v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Fort MyersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Cabot v. First National Bank of Fort Walton BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ad's Enterprises, LLC v. Ocean BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API