Legal Opinion

Whitman Et Ux. v. Lowe

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The complaint is tort, under G. L. 6956, for the recovery of treble damages for cutting timber. Trial by jury, verdict for plaintiffs for $181.00 actual damages. By a special verdict the jury failed to find that defendant acted through mistake or had good reason to believe that he had a right to cut the timber in question. Judgment on verdict for treble damages.

The case comes here on exception by defendant to the overruling of his motion for a directed verdict, to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict, to the charge of the court, to the admission and exclusion of evidence taken…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Carleton v. E. & T. Fairbanks & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Adams v. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  4. J. H. Silsby & Co. v. KinsleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. Davis v. CoteySupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lavalette v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. Parker Et Ux. v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Munson v. GoodroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. In Re Sawyer's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API