Legal Opinion
Borgen v. Corty
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 10, 1930No. 28,092PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, C.
This was an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate a writ of attachment and a levy made thereunder on the ground that the writ was void for the reason that no summons had been issued in the action prior to or at the time of the issuance of the writ of attachment and also for the reason that the ground for attachment was not substantiated by competent evidence.
The plaintiff on March 3, 1930, sued out a writ of attachment and on the same day caused the sheriff to levy on real estate belonging to the defendant. The respondent stated upon oral argument in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barber v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Lockey v. LockeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Webster Manufacturing Co. v. PenrodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- McCormick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hudson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chapman v. FoshaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Melin v. AronsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Pilgrim Distributing Corp. v. Galsworthy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Nash v. S. M. Braman Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941