Legal Opinion

Craig Anthony Gilder v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 2015No. 14-14-00523-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Martha Hill Jamison, Justice

Appellant Craig Anthony Gilder appeals his conviction for failure to comply with a sex-offender registration requirement. See Tex. Code Crím. Proc. Ann. art. 62.102 (West Supp.2014). In a single issue, he contends the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction because no rational juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant committed the offense with the requisite culpable mental state. We affirm.

Background

In 1988, appellant was convicted of sexual assault, which subjected him to registration as a sex offender under article…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Losada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Albert Dotie, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  3. Robert Lee Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Christopher Dale Havens v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
  5. Damien Cavazos v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API