Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 2006, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was employed by a job placement agency as a recruiter specializing in locating candidates with technological expertise. After his employment was terminated, he filed an application for unemployment insurance benefits. That application was granted and, between November 15, 2001 and July 28, 2002, claimant received $14,985 in benefits. During this time,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Claim of SwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Claim of FrithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GazzaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of NigroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re of the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Claim of Ingrao-WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. In re the Claim of LahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API