Legal Opinion

In re Claim of Frith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2005, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant worked at a brokerage firm from 1997 through 2001 at which time the firm was acquired by another company. He returned to the firm in 2003 as a commissioned salesperson, but did not earn any commissions. Beginning in May or June 2003, claimant entered into an arrangement with the firm whereby he spent his time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RestivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of BrinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of SavageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of StandigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of LapczynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API