Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Ernst & Young

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 25, 1994No. 93-489PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a negligence action brought by the purchaser of a video rental business against the employer of the accountant who advised her concerning the purchase. The district court found that both the accountant and the seller, a released party, were negligent. Fault was apportioned between them and judgment entered against the defendant for its proportionate share of the damages.

The buyer appeals from the finding of the district court that the seller was at fault. Defendant cross-appeals the court’s calculation of damages. We reverse and remand on the appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KanneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Haupt v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Meier v. Alfa-Laval, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Tratchel v. Essex Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Van Sickle Construction Co. v. Wachovia Commercial Mortgage, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Ezzone v. RiccardiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Michele M. Pitts v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and Donald SchifferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. Sain v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API