Legal Opinion

In re Young

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1949No. 5544Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the Primary Examiner’s requirement of division between a group consisting of two claims for a composition of matter (defined as a copper-chromium mixed oxides hydrogenation catalyst), on the one hand, and, on the other hand, a group of seven claims for an alleged improvement in a process for making phenyl methyl carbinol, one of the steps of which is the use of the catalyst so described.

The article claims which appellant elected to prosecute were finally allowed by the examiner. They are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. In re CoulterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re MossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. In re HirschhornCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. Bruce v. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API