Legal Opinion

In re Hirschhorn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 17, 1947No. 5334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting claims 9 to 13, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for tea balls and a method of making them, on the ground of misjoinder of invention.

Appellant’s application originally contained thirteen claims, of which method claims 1 to 8, inclusive, were directed to methods of making tea balls, and claims 9 to 13, inclusive, were directed to the *1157article. Division between those groups of claims was required by the Primary Examiner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. In re GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GookinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  2. In re HendersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re YoungCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API