Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Snow

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1904No. 2955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

The plaintiff seeks by this action to recover from the defendants upon a bond executed by them for the faithful performance by the defendant Snow of his official duties the sum of $1,868.32, alleged to have been received by him in his official capacity during his term of office and appropriated to his own use. Snow held the office of “auditor and assessor” of the plaintiff for two years, during the time for which the bond was given, and the moneys which the plaintiff seeks to recover are a portion of the taxes upon personal property collected by him by virtue of his office.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. DexterSupreme Court of Florida · 1859
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Matthews, Finley & Co. v. Sands & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Matter of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. People v. BreyfogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People Ex Rel. Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Town of Fairbanks v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  5. Hurlebaus v. American Falls Reservoir DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API