Legal Opinion
Foster-Hyatt Group of Companies v. West Caldwell Planning Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 9, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
KING, J. A. D.
Plaintiff appeals from the affirmance by the Law Division of the Mayor and Council of the Borough of West Caldwell’s affirmance of the planning board’s denial of an “approval of change of use” and five bulk variances for its property on block 93, lot 7, situated at 1085 Bloomfield Avenue. The application was made to the planning board pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-60(a). See Cranmer v. Evesham Tp., 162 N.J.Super. 204, 210-213 (Law Div. 1978).
The property in question is located in a B-3 commercial zone. The property was acquired by plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. Boonton Tp. Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Wallington Home Owners Ass'n v. BOR. OF WALLINGTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Wallington Home Owners Ass'n v. Borough of WallingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Cranmer v. Township of EveshamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufmann v. Planning Bd. for Warren Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Conselice v. Borough of Seaside ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- FOSTER-HYATT GROUP, ETC. v. W. Caldwell Plan. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980