Legal Opinion
Conselice v. Borough of Seaside Park
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 18, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
CARCHMAN, J.A.D.
This is a zoning case. The narrow issue is whether a proposed expansion to the conforming use, a residence, of a preexisting nonconforming integrated mixed use, residence and real estate office, requires a use variance, N.J.S.A 40:55D-70(d). The trial judge answered this question in the affirmative. We agree and affirm.
These are the relevant and undisputed facts. Plaintiff Anthony Conselice is the son of the owner of the property located at 210 North Central Avenue, Seaside Park, New Jersey (the property). Plaintiff resides at the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Cell South of NJ, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF WEST WINDSOR TWP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Town of Belleville v. Parrillo's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nuckel v. Borough of Little Ferry Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Motley v. Borough of Seaside Park Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Nuckel v. LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BD.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011