Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Keystone Driller Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1953No. Appeal, No. 65Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

Defendant, Keystone Driller Company, appeals from judgment entered on a jury’s verdict for plaintiff in an assumpsit action. The claim was for personal services rendered as an industrial consultant. Defendant contended that plaintiff was not an independent contractor hired on a fee basis but rather an employe entitled to no more than the amounts permitted by the General Salary Stabilization Regulation. Such amount was tendered by defendant and refused by plaintiff.

These opposing contentions raise an issue of fact for a jury. Testimony was introduced by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malamed v. SedelskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Bidwell v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  3. Hoffman v. Bloomsburg & Sullivan R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Dungan v. American Life Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API