Legal Opinion

Allen v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 15, 1995No. 2560932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Judge.

The appellant, Olan Conway Allen, was convicted of breaking and entering and grand larceny. On appeal, he contends that the Commonwealth failed to produce exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), that the indictments should have been dismissed on double jeopardy grounds, and that the trial court gave an improper jury instruction. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s decisions.

In 1992, the appellant was charged with breaking and entering and grand larceny. A jury found him guilty on both charges.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Ida Lynnette Davis, s/k/a Ida Lynette Davis v. CWCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Omar Vincent Craddock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  4. Robert Santora, s/k/a Robert J. Santora v. CWCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  5. Samuel Wise Chang v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API