Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Crumble

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 24, 1964No. 14413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Matthew Crumble, was convicted, following a trial before the court without a jury, of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 2422 by knowingly inducing a woman, Gloria Dixon, to go in interstate commerce as a passenger on a line of a common carrier from Milwaukee, Wisconsin t<? Minneapolis, Minnesota for the purpose of prostitution. He was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years.

The main contested issues presented by defendant’s appeal are:(1) Whether there is sufficient competent evidence in the record to sustain the conviction.(2) Whether the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Feldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Ali Ahmad Ali Abdel-Khaleq and Ascary Kanahan-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Ned C. BakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. Opinion No. Oag 51-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API