Legal Opinion

Sixeas v. Fogel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 26, 1929No. Gen. No. 33,230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryner

The plaintiff was the lessor and the defendant, Vogue Smart Shop, was the assignee of the lessee of certain premises located at 4017 West Madison Street in the City of Chicago. The lease between the parties contained two paragraphs pertinent to the issue raised on this appeal. They read: •

“It is expressly agreed between the parties hereto, that in case the lessee shall make any default in respect to- any of the foregoing covenants, . . . then, and in any of said cases the lessors may at their option at once, without notice to the lessee or to any other person, terminate this lease; and upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  2. Hamer v. ButterlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. McKinney v. James A. Brady Foundry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Foster v. RudisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Famous Permanent Wave Shops, Inc. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Craft v. CalmeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Avdich v. KleinertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Village of New Athens v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. Village of New AthensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API