Legal Opinion

Famous Permanent Wave Shops, Inc. v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,711PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiff filed its complaint in chancery seeking to restrain defendant from declaring a forfeiture of, or attempting to terminate a lease between defendant as lessor and plaintiff as lessee and from taking any steps to recover possession of the demised premises from plaintiff, and by its amended complaint asked for money damages; defendant moved to dismiss the complaint as amended on the ground the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter, plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law and, the complaint was insufficient in law to entitle plaintiff to the relief sought, which motion the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cottrell v. GersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fritts v. Cloud Oak Flooring CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Waukegan Times Theatre Corp. v. ConradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. A.P. Development Corp. v. BandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Stamm v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. M.J.G. Properties, Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API