Legal Opinion
Curacao Trading Co. v. Federal Ins. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLANCY, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues on defendant’s floating import policy insuring against physical loss or damage from any external cause, including non-delivery. By a certificate issued April 3, 1939 in accordance with the usage of the trade, this policy was made to apply to a lot of cocoa beans described by bag numbers and quality marks copied into the certificate from warehouse receipts therefor issued to it by the warehouseman; one of them on April 3rd and the others on March 31st, 1939. The policy and certificate are one for the purpose of interpretation or construction. Brandyce v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ferrer v. . PyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Merrill-Ruckgaber Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- First National Bank of Toledo v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Brandyce v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friscia v. Safeguard InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Groban v. S.S. PeguDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Curacao Trading Co. v. William Stake & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Curacao Trading Co. v. Federal Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Gould v. City Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.