Sunderland v. Whitcomb
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentEllington, J.
(dissenting) — I must respectfully dissent. I believe the will is ambiguous, and that it was effective to revoke the living trust. I would therefore affirm.
The objective in a probate proceeding is to determine the intent of the testator. RCW 11.12.230; In re Estate of Bergau, 103 Wn.2d 431, 435, 693 P.2d 703 (1985). The objective in interpreting a trust is to determine the intent of the settlor. Old Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Spokane v. Hughes, 16 Wn.2d 584, 587, 134 P.2d 63 (1943); Seattle First Nat’l Bank v. Crosby, 42 Wn.2d 234, 246, 254 P.2d 732 (1953). The fact that Robert Furst’s will…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Old National Bank & Union Trust Co. v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Poltz v. TyreeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985