Legal Opinion

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community School v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 8, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 99-0549, 1 CA-CV 00-0225PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge

¶ 1 This action challenges the validity of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 15-185(D) (Supp.2000), commonly known as the “Deduct Statute.” In granting summary judgment to the State of Arizona and the individual defendants (the “state”), the trial court upheld the statute and rejected arguments that it violated the Equal Protection Clauses of the Arizona and United States Constitutions, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (1994) as implemented by 34 C.F.R. § 100.3(b)(2) (2000), and the Pastor Amendment, 20 U.S.C. § 8064(g)(2000). We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caviness v. Horizon Community Learning Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Lindsay v. Cave Creek Outfitters, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Craven v. HuppenthalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. University Physicians, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Caviness v. Horizon CommunityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API