Legal Opinion

Caviness v. Horizon Community Learning Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2010No. 08-15245PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether a private non-profit corporation that runs a charter school 1 in Arizona was a state actor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when it took certain employment-related actions with respect to a former teacher, Michael Caviness. The district court held that Horizon Community Learning Center (“Horizon”) and its executive director, Lawrence Pieratt, were not functioning as state actors in these circumstances. 2 Because the allegations in Caviness’s complaint are insufficient to raise a reasonable inference that Horizon was a state actor and thus…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Victor Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Kenneth Rawson v. Recovery Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Ismail v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API