Legal Opinion
Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 1962No. 50PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
369 U.S. 95 (1962)
LOCAL 174, TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA,
v.
LUCAS FLOUR CO.
No. 50.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 7-8, 1961.
Decided March 5, 1962.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
Francis Hoague argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Stuart G. Oles argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Seth W. Morrison.
2Opinion of the Court · StewartJustice Stewart
The petitioner and the respondent (which we shall call the union and the employer) were parties to a collective bargaining contract within the purview of the National Labor Relations Act. The contract…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017