Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Seefried

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1959No. 34766PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action for a brokerage commission, entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence at’ the close of plaintiff’s case.

The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury. In this posture of the case we are required to view plaintiff’s evidence in its most favorable light to determine whether there was sufficient evidence or reasonable inference therefrom to establish a prima facie case for plaintiff. O’Brien v. Schultz, 45 Wn. (2d) 769, 278 P. (2d) 322 (1954), and cases cited therein.

' With the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grace Realty Co. v. Peytavin Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Feeley v. MullikinWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Henning v. Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Thayer v. DamianoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Chamness v. MarquisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Town & Country Real Estate, Inc. v. WalesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API