Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1990No. 12208PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for dueling. NMSA 1978, § 30-20-11 (Repl. Pamp.1984). He raises five issues on appeal. We reverse on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to send the case to the jury.

FACTS

We accept the facts as recited in the docketing statement and the parties’ memoranda in response to the calendar notices, because the facts are unchallenged. State v. Boyer, 103 N.M. 655, 712 P.2d 1 (Ct.App. 1985); State v. Calanche, 91 N.M. 390, 574 P.2d 1018 (Ct.App.1978).

Randy Johnson, defendant’s neighbor, was watching television on the night of April 13,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API