Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2004No. 0201-00624; CA A120056; SC S51097PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

The issue in this case is whether a self-insured entity may be liable for attorney fees in the same circumstances as an insurer. We hold that the answer to that question is yes.

ORS 742.061, the text of which is set out below, generally provides that a person may recover reasonable attorney fees from an insurer if the following sequence of events occurs: (1) the person presents a proof of loss to an insurer; (2) the parties fail to settle the claim within six months; and (3) the person files an action seeking recovery under the insurance policy and obtains a recovery that exceeds any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of LebanonOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Wilson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. CaveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Edwards v. Riverdale School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API