Legal Opinion
Southern California Darts Assn v. Dino M. Zaffina
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2014No. 13-55780PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLF, Senior District Judge:
The district court entered summary judgment for plaintiff-appellee Southern California Darts Association (“SoCal”) and issued a permanent injunction enjoining defendant-appellant Dino M. Zaffina from using certain marks that have been used by SoCal for several decades. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
For forty years or more, SoCal has promoted the competitive play of the game of darts and has coordinated league play of this game. For a time, beginning in the 1960s, members of SoCal formed and ran a corporation named…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Mitchell SteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ak Futures LLC v. Boyd Street Distro, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Christopher Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Speedtrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.