State v. Zeiner
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
Lamont W. Zeiner appeals from the restitution order entered by the district court as a condition of probation following his conviction for aiding a felon, contraiy to K.S.A. 21-3812(a), a severity level 8 nonperson felony. Zeiner contends the district court erred in imposing restitution for damages not caused by his crime.
We reverse. The damages were not caused by Zeiner s crime, nor did he acquiesce to payment of damages in the underlying plea agreement. Consequently, under K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4610(d)(1), an order of restitution should not have been imposed.
The controlling facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DexterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003