Legal Opinion

State v. Zeiner

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 23, 2003No. 88,754PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

Lamont W. Zeiner appeals from the restitution order entered by the district court as a condition of probation following his conviction for aiding a felon, contraiy to K.S.A. 21-3812(a), a severity level 8 nonperson felony. Zeiner contends the district court erred in imposing restitution for damages not caused by his crime.

We reverse. The damages were not caused by Zeiner s crime, nor did he acquiesce to payment of damages in the underlying plea agreement. Consequently, under K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4610(d)(1), an order of restitution should not have been imposed.

The controlling facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DexterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API