Legal Opinion

State v. Wallace

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Lane: James W. Hamilton, Judge, The defendant, Charles L. Wallace, was indicted for the crime of seduction under promise of marriage, and, having been convicted and sentenced thereon, prosecutes this appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Benson

1. It is contended by appellant that, since it appears conclusively from the record that at the time of the commission of the alleged crime the prosecutrix was a divorced woman, she was not “an unmarried female” within the meaning of the statute, and that therefore the defendant was entitled to an instructed verdict of acquittal. The statute under which the prosecution is maintained provides that:

“If any person, under promise of marriage, shall seduce and have illicit connection with any unmarried female of previous chaste character, such person, upon conviction, shall be punished,” etc.

Our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jennings v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Carrens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Phillips v. AshworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. State v. EddySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Smith v. Grand High Court of Jericho of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Wiley v. FleckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API