Lumpkin v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Lumpkin, Austin, and Fields present an array of challenges to their convictions for conspiring and attempting to rob and kill fellow drug dealers who, in fact, were undercover police officers. There are three significant issues on appeal: whether the trial court (1) committed plain error in failing to give a special unanimity instruction as to the overt acts of the charged conspiracy; (2) committed plain error in twice ordering the jury to continue its deliberations, without giving a cautionary instruction to minimize juror coercion, after a poll each time revealed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- James L. Byrd v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.