Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1991No. 88-536, 88-568 and 88-614PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

Lumpkin, Austin, and Fields present an array of challenges to their convictions for conspiring and attempting to rob and kill fellow drug dealers who, in fact, were undercover police officers. There are three significant issues on appeal: whether the trial court (1) committed plain error in failing to give a special unanimity instruction as to the overt acts of the charged conspiracy; (2) committed plain error in twice ordering the jury to continue its deliberations, without giving a cautionary instruction to minimize juror coercion, after a poll each time revealed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. James L. Byrd v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API