Legal Opinion

(PS) Smith Jr. v. Baker

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 27, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01029Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 COURTNEY SMITH JR., No. 2:24-cv-01029 DJC AC (PS) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 NATHAN P. BAKER and CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Both defendants have specially 19 appeared and move to dismiss this case, alleging improper service. ECF No. 4 and 6. Defendant 20 Nathan P. Baker also asserts the case…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API