Legal Opinion
Rubidoux v. Colorado Mental Health Institute
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 10, 1997No. Civil Action No. 94-WM-202Published
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, employees of the Defendant Colorado Mental Health Institute of Pueblo (“CMHIP”), sued Defendant for both quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment, as well as for unlawful retaliation. Those claims survived Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in accordance with my Order, dated February 24, 1997. All other Defendants were dismissed.
As I have previously ruled, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). Following a one-week trial and the submission of arguments of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Sauers v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Sharon Karibian v. Columbia University, John Borden, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees v. Mark Urban, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.