Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Kendall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 149, Calendar No. 35,828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

At the oral request of defendant, plaintiffs, copartners, on September 10, 1929, purchased for him 10 shares of stock of the Union Commerce Corporation, paid $3,250 therefor, and $20 commission to a broker, and the next day forwarded the same, with draft attached, to defendant. ’Defendant did not accept, and the stock and draft were re turned to plaintiffs. Subsequent efforts proved unavailing, although defendant recognized that it was his purchase. Shortly thereafter the Union Commerce Corporation merged with the Guardian Detroit Union Group, and, on or about December 31, 1929, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Herron Northwest, Inc. v. DanskinWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mass v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Vogler v. GustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API