Vogler v. Gustin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
In January and February, 3926, defendants sold to plaintiff some Class B stock of Copeland Products, Incorporated, owned by them, but which had not been accepted for filing by the Michigan securities commission. On March 13th, plaintiff tendered back the stock and demanded return of the purchase price, as provided by section 20, Act No. 220, Pub. Acts 1923 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9788). Return being refused, he commenced this suit to recover the price paid. Defendants had judgment on trial before the court without a jury.
Plaintiff’s stock was paid for by brokers, to whom defendants sent it for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Eastman v. KendallMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Whittier v. Electric Refrigeration Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Selected Investments Co. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- People, for Use of Harley v. HendrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1933