Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellee, as in replevin, for the recovery of a spring wagon. The defendant answered in three paragraphs :

1. A general denial.

2. Property in the defendant.

3. Special property in the defendant as bailee of the wagon, claiming a lien thereon as a mechanic for work done thereon.

Reply in two paragraphs, to the second and third paragraphs of the answer. Trial by jury, vei’dict for the defendant, motion by the plaintiff for a new trial overruled, and final judgment for the defendant.

The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hendrickson & Sons Motor Co. v. OSHAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Holderman v. ManierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Caldwell v. Auto Sales & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Welker v. ApplemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API