Tucker v. Taylor
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.
This was an action by the appellant against the appellee, as in replevin, for the recovery of a spring wagon. The defendant answered in three paragraphs :
1. A general denial.
2. Property in the defendant.
3. Special property in the defendant as bailee of the wagon, claiming a lien thereon as a mechanic for work done thereon.
Reply in two paragraphs, to the second and third paragraphs of the answer. Trial by jury, vei’dict for the defendant, motion by the plaintiff for a new trial overruled, and final judgment for the defendant.
The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial.
The…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hendrickson & Sons Motor Co. v. OSHAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Holderman v. ManierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Caldwell v. Auto Sales & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Welker v. ApplemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.