United States v. Lawrence D. Hartford, AKA 'Larry,' United States of America v. Dale Bowdoin, United States of America v. Mike Newton
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals from convictions, pursuant to guilty pleas, of violations of federal narcotics statutes,1 the common issue presented for resolution is the validity of the respective sentences imposed by the district court upon the three appellants. After a careful review of the record in each case, we vacate the sentences imposed on appellants Hartford and Bowdoin and affirm the judgment as to appellant Newton.
These three appeals arise from a similar factual setting. Each appellant was indicted by a grand jury on several charges of violations of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Donald Bernard Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Harry William Daniels, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burt Beavers v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Eugene HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James Morrow Roper, Christian Matthew Newton, John Jackson Miller TruxellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.