Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Sixty-Six Melmore Gardens
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 20, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
106 N.J. Super. 182 (1969)
254 A.2d 545
EVELYN WILSON, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
SIXTY-SIX MELMORE GARDENS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, BERNARD TULCHINSKY AND ANDREE BUILA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY DIVISION ON CIVIL RIGHTS, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 28, 1969.
Decided June 20, 1969.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. Jack Borrus argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Borrus, Goldin & Foley, attorneys).
Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division on Civil Rights (Mr. Arthur J. Sills,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. Concord CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Atkinson v. ParsekianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Clover Hill Swimming Club, Inc. v. GoldsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Indiana Steel & Wire Co. v. StudesIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. College of Med. & Dent. of NJ, RutgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Simpson v. KennedySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- K-Mart Corp. v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- K-Mart Corp. v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989