Hennigan v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The primary focus of Joseph Hennigan’s contentions in this appeal is his indictment of the institution of the grand jury. His complaints are directed generally to the function of the grand jury in Wyoming and specifically to claimed defects that are present in his case. His claims encompass assertions that he was denied due process of law and the equal protection of the laws. He also argues that his conviction should be set aside because the grand jury was not properly impaneled since there was no specific finding of necessity for calling a grand jury; the indictments are…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Burke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Almada v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Smallwood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.