Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Rankin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1931No. 20851PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The intention of the parties is the prevailing consideration in the construction of contracts. Under some conditions it becomes a question of fact -whether a contract executed by an agent in his own name individually is his individual undertaking or is that of his principal acting through him as agent. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3594, 3611. Where it does not appear from the face of the contract whether it .is the signer’s individual undertaking or is that of his principal acting-through him as the principal’s agent, it. may, especially where the contract is not executed under seal, be shown…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Merchants' Bank v. Central BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  3. Cleaveland v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Burden v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Cooper v. G. E. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Evans v. SmithdealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API