Legal Opinion

Branger v. Buttrick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Iowa County. Motion to dismiss tbe appeal. Tbe facts appear in tbe opinion. '

1Opinion of the CourtDixon, C. J.

The motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the defendants for the reason that one of the sureties named in the undertaking is a practising attorney in one of the circuit courts of this state, as shown by affidavit annexed to the motion, must have prevailed hut for the counter application of the defendants for leave to file a new and sufficient undertaking in this court, which undertaking, duly executed, the defendants now present for that purpose. The practice of allowing such amendments, or of permitting new undertakings to be so filed, has prevailed in this court ever since…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Venator v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. City of Fond du Lac v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Falk v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API