Legal Opinion

Dittman v. Medical Solution, L.L.C.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 11, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01851Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYON DITTMAN, No. 2:17-cv-01851-MCE-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 MEDICAL SOLUTION, L.L.C., 15 Defendant. 16 17 By way of this action, Plaintiff Bryon Dittman (“Plaintiff”) seeks to recover for 18 claims that derive from his theory that Defendant Medical Solution, L.L.C., (“Defendant”) 19 should have included amounts paid to nurse employees for travel reimbursement (“per 20 diem”) in their regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating overtime wages.1 Presently 21 before the Court are the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
  4. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API