Baker v. BP America Production Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Chief Justice.
{1} In this appeal we decide where venue lies in an action involving multiple defendants, all of which are foreign corporations. See NMSA 1978, § 38-3-1 (1988). The district court ruled that venue was proper in any county as to nine of the foreign corporations because these defendants did not maintain a statutory agent in the state. The court then concluded that venue was also proper in any county against Defendant British Petroleum (BP), although BP maintains a statutory agent with a residence in Lea County, New Mexico. On certiorari, BP contends that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Raskob v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Teaver v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Sunwest Bank of Albuquerque v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CarlosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gardiner v. Galles Chevrolet Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Blancett v. Dial Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Kaywal, Inc. v. Avangrid Renewables, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bank of America v. Apache Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008